Видео

Thank you Mr Abbott for your evaluation, and brief summing-up of the geopolitical challenge that the growingly aggressive, assertive, and increasingly hostile China, and its limitless friendship express to the United States and its many committed, engaged allies, (including the Western alliance, the Aukus alliance, Jarokus alliance, and indeed NATO.) What will it take for the United States and its many committed, engaged allies to outcompete, and leave China behind in the tech race? And how can the United States and its allies enhance their geopolitical standing as China aggressively expands its global reach?

1:15:07 man…this is so beautifully said. Love ya, Abe!

Individuals from the North need to understand the experiences of those living in the South. Instead of using academic degrees to try to impose interpretations of the Civil War, take a look at what is happening in America today. Our rights are eroding, and those in power are becoming wealthier by enforcing unjust laws. The topic of enslaved individuals was simply a tool for Lincoln to garner support from the people. This parallels the current situation within the Democratic party. The current influx of illegal aliens crossing our borders is being supported by advocates who are endeavoring to sway public opinion, reminiscent of the strategies employed by historical figures such as Lincoln. The significant concerns regarding the ongoing infringement of rights in the Southern region must not be underestimated. The notion of succession continues to be perceived as a potential solution to this pressing issue. Lincoln was not honest; he was a politician.

1 Samuel chapter 8 , Democracy is atheism, so the constitution debate in 1776 is that the United States should be republic or democracy. Some people believe that the United States should not be democracy. The Democratic-Republicans believe that the thirteen states in North America should be democracy. Therefore, The Democratic Party has been an atheism party since 1776, so Thomas Jefferson cooperates with the French Jacobin to issue the Declaration of the Rights of Man in 1789 that believe atheism. And because Democratic-Republican Party believe democracy, make the Civil War, then democrats cooperate with communists since 1918, but the meaning of republic should be consistent with Ten Commandments, may LORD has mercy on us.

The Civil War was caused by a minority trying to overthrow the legitimate government elected by a majority. Ring any bells??

Excellent presentation!.

Mr professor Guelzo thank you for the conference, Civil war no civil war in brussel ? NO WAR because the war requires fighters i have been evicted from my home payed during 20 years a forced sale at 50 % ILLEGALE they told me if not happy we can forbidden you the access to the street where the home is ( justice ???? WHERE IS A JUSTICE ° i have been facility manager a head of projects public procurement AMERICA given lessons to the world new country in born 3 or 4 big challenges simultaniousely slavery the East West railway and the enlargement of the territory and the population many countries are not able to cope simply on a daily basis this shows that the USA engine of endurance and silence in the face of hardships your comment my professor thank you so much 🤫🤫🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭

Be comprehensive i am traumatized if you want to support the stateless person in Brussels the wind of change Reunion Fred Ulman Great-grandfather killed civilian by spain 1926 the uncle civilian killed by france algeria 59/60 the grand father evicted 24 HOURS algeria loosing all money buisness 1970 The father evicted at midnight france (corsica) 1970 innocent ( because corisicain dead accident in office ) the father a forced sale Morocco 1982 at 50 % and me forced sale Brussel at 50 % trying to kill many times The truth all the truth i swear

LOL 😄 The Constitution is whatever the Kangaroo Court of the United States wants it to be

Professor Allen GUELZO a petition is in circulation to professors Larry Armn & Richard Saller if you want to support the stateless person in Brussels the wind of change Reunion Fred Ulman the maintenace of vehicle refuzed by the first cars dealer a citizen since a quarter century clean criminal record a forced sale at 50 % of my home counter expertise forbidden removed from administration passeport to leave EU expered

professor an anecdote my second daughter had also a presentation to give , so inviting her to give the first presentation okay but you can do better repeat again no it's too late repeat again 😳🥺🥺 the day after coming home so happy than ever 18 or 19/20 you can realize that your father has just ambitions for you

professor Allen GUELZO Many Thanks it's a time for me to be interested by History my Daughter given us a presentation at home before the presentation to gve at school about the nobel Price of litterature Jean marie Le clezio 😟🙁 The specialist speaking about the micro cosme at the border coutries and cultures ☹you can tell me her note at school 18/20 😟😕🧐🧐🧐

First off, slavery would never have been reinstated throughout the western hemisphere had not the Union won. Secondly, he argued that the Union victory prevented anarchy when, in reality, the Union effort to win the war, its’ victory, and the aftermath caused the most anarchistic period in American history. There’s a valid argument to say that secession was a victory for democracy. Read the Declaration of Independence, especially “the right to alter, abolish, and institute new government” part.

Corny I know, but I get chills listening to this fellow. At 81 I guess I am allowed to be optimistic.

God, I hope he is correct.

This guy is delusional about his interpretations of the two regions and why there was a war.

"some settler expansion"--literally the genocide of the American Indian from the Mississippi river to the Pacific Ocean, but sure, okay

The party of Lincoln today is unrecognizable with regard to Lincoln's theory of a democratic republic.

What a great speech. I highly recommend Dr. Guelzo's newest book on American faith, too. Guelzo is an American treasure. Most and truly.

I question that the USA ditched English Common Law and Statute Law after the War of Independence. I understand that you have Habeas Corpus. If you have then it must be based on the 1679 Act of Parliament.

If the question of slave states seceding from a union bent on outlawing long coddled slavery (which had enriched both sides handsomely for decades if not hundreds of years) was considered in the supreme court how would it have been resolved? Slavery, though an odious institution was very much legal at the time. Unconstitutional taking of property rights would result from emancipation legislation. Damages would have been stupendous. The court would likely have had to strike down emancipation. That is why Lincoln stoked the flame of secession and ultimately civil war itself. Through war - he could accomplish emancipation. It was simply a legal work-around/maneuver. There was no other way to abolish slavery and make it stick in the courts?

Excellent presentation. Thank you.

Loved this presentation..genius!

The war was about whether we would have hamburgers or pizza, every one knows that.

Slavery.

I’m sure the indigenous people that were slaughtered or purposely sickened by the United States, would not consider the 100 years between 1800 to 1900, boring…with or without a civil war. The statement from this history professor that it would have been a boring century without the American civil probably needs to return to the classroom…as a student.

And then there was Lincoln's role in the Matson slave trial.

Yeah, Rhode Island and Massachusetts had profited enormously not only from the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, but also from doing business with the Caribbean slave industries.

Then the Union "liberated" the Indians.

The American Civil War was a Democrat insurrection in pursuit of more political power, based, in part, on slavery.

Guelzo for President.

This man is an excellent speaker!

Professor Smith is an ageless wonder! i have listened to his Yale intro to political philosophy a dozen of times. The man is a brilliant mind at work with a unique and disarming ability of articulation. His striking question to his class still rings very much in my ears: 'If Plato is a fascist, what does it make you?'

The civil war disproved and reversed what the revolutionary war proved. That a right of sovereignty exists when two disparate factions no longer afford economic and political harmony. When an issue of the magnitude of unconstitutional taking of property on that scale exists - the fall out will persist for hundreds of years. There was little or no silver lining. Beyond a hungry freedom - slaves received nothing for their lifetimes of toils which developed the textile industry and industrial revolution in the US and Britain. Freed slaves should have received their own sovereign land hold - a sub-nation carved out from 2-4 border states on both sides of the Mason Dixon line. However, Lincoln and the abolitionists did not and could not get the votes to back that up. Instead, we have an assassinated president and our inner cities as they are today. This is an economic, political, and social travesty. Where is the real academic study and analysis of the real economics here?

A minority portion of its people?

@user-gf3lw5pi4t -- Mankind *must* be governed. History proves this ... The biggest issue with the governess is who is doing the governing?

What Mr. Guelzo is showing with his words on history is the *utter and absolute stupidity* of the human species.

I agree with the idea that it proved that Republican government does not necessary end in anarchy, however the point that slavery would have been "re-instated" ignores the economic realities of the institution. Slavery had no chance in a head-to-head contest with Capitalism; every culture that started embracing Capitalism benefited from the Industrial Revolution, and all began to recognized and institutionalize trade for mutual benefit within their laws. Slavery is antithetical to the trader principle and the concept of individual rights that Capitalism requires. It's more likely that the failure of the Union to destroy slavery would have pushed the conflict further into the future, when technology would have made the inevitable war even more bloody...

That was amazing!

Allen is an incredible speaker!!! I could listen to him lecture all day long and he certainly knows his civil war facts

Democracies protect themselves against internal instability? Double speak that actually inspires tyrants everywhere

Wait, is that Dr Frazier Winslow Crane?

Outstanding orator, ty, big up By the way, Lincoln had a "walk in spirit" from fourth density (it happens occasionally) who lived out the rest of Lincoln's life and carried forth his mission, which he felt too weak to carry out, starting I believe in 1852. And there's a reference to this in Big Bang Theory where Sheldon says, "Can you imagine how history would have turned out if robots from the future (negative extraterrestrials) became involved in the civil war?" Quite a seemingly strange statement; now you know what it means. It's true. Read The Ra Material.

The US Cuvil War was about slavery & white supremacy exactly as spelled out in the third article if Constitution Of The Confederate States If America & echoed in every single Confederate state constitution

Excellent video. However, what is happening today our politicians are destroying our democracy based on being free and a lawful society based on the constitution and declaration of independence. So what does the professor have to say about this administration opening our borders to those who could care less about our Constitution or Declaration of Independence. Not to mention those coming across the border are terrorist. So maybe that is why we are a republic.

"democratic government would have been shown to be incapable of avoiding anarchy when a minority portion of its people decided they no longer wished to abide by its political direction and claimed a popular sovereign right to withdraw." ---as happened in the Revolution; as detailed as a right of man in the Declaration. You putz.

Professor Guelzo is my favorite American historian and interpreter. This 1 hour lecture explains what happened in 1861 when economics and regional differences clashed with philosophy and practical governance. I love Lincoln and i hate war and what a horrible job he was selected to do for the America he believed in. We should never forget the American Civil War and what it proves about preserving democracy.

1:06:21 [democracy] “is not some fragile flower…it has strength that is drawn from the natural order of things…”

1:05:45 “…in a democracy you expect crisis…”

EASY MONEY BASED ON SLAVERY